History of the Death Penalty in America
The death penalty has deep roots in American history, imported from English common law during the colonial era. Early colonial statutes prescribed death for a wide range of offenses, including theft, witchcraft, and adultery. Public hangings were common and seen as spectacles intended to deter crime and reinforce social order.
During the 18th and 19th centuries, states gradually reduced the number of capital crimes, reserving the death penalty mainly for murder and treason. The methods of execution also shifted, with hanging giving way to electrocution in the late 19th century. These changes reflected evolving views on punishment and the emergence of the idea of “humane” executions.
The 20th century brought new scrutiny of the death penalty. Concerns about wrongful convictions, racial bias, and arbitrary application led to growing public debate. Some states experimented with gas chambers and later lethal injection, claiming these methods were more humane than electrocution or hanging.
In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court effectively suspended the death penalty in Furman v. Georgia, ruling that existing statutes allowed for arbitrary and discriminatory sentencing. This decision invalidated death penalty laws nationwide and commuted the sentences of hundreds of people on death row.
States quickly revised their laws, seeking to address the Court’s concerns. In 1976, the Supreme Court upheld new sentencing schemes in Gregg v. Georgia, reinstating the death penalty under guided discretion statutes. Executions resumed in 1977 with the firing squad death of Gary Gilmore in Utah.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, executions increased dramatically, reaching a peak in 1999 with 98 executions carried out nationwide. This period was marked by tough-on-crime policies, mandatory minimums, and expanding the list of capital crimes, reflecting the political climate of the era.
At the same time, anti-death penalty movements grew stronger. The emergence of DNA testing in the 1990s revealed wrongful convictions, casting doubt on the infallibility of the justice system. Advocates highlighted the racial disparities and high costs associated with capital punishment.
In the 2000s, executions began to decline as public support waned and litigation over lethal injection protocols delayed executions. Several states imposed moratoria, citing concerns over wrongful convictions and the morality of the practice. This period saw growing calls for abolition from lawmakers across the political spectrum.
Illinois became a turning point in 2011 when it abolished the death penalty following a series of high-profile exonerations. Other states followed, including Connecticut, Maryland, and New Hampshire, often after years of advocacy by victims’ families, faith groups, and legal organizations.
The 2010s and 2020s have seen continued challenges to the death penalty. Legal battles over execution methods, international condemnation, and shifting public opinion have put pressure on states to reconsider. Some states have formally repealed the death penalty, while others maintain moratoria that have effectively halted executions.
Despite this progress, the death penalty remains in force in over half the states, and some continue to carry out executions. However, the overall trend points toward decline, as courts, legislators, and the public grapple with the moral, legal, and practical failures of the system. The history of the death penalty in America is one of evolving standards, reflecting deeper questions about justice, fairness, and the value of human life.
Contact:
Crusade to End the Death Penalty
Chicago, iL 60645-4568
matthew@crusadetoendthedeathpenalty.org
Please email Executive for Street Address
Crusade to End the Death Penalty is a 501(c)(4) organization founded in Illinois on June 30, 2025 by its Executive Director the Rev. Matthew González, J.D. He applied for trademark protection on the name and logo with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 2, 2025.
Text is copyright 2025 by the Executive Director, on whose ideas the website copy is based, aided in some sections by ChatGPT 4o.